Μake us preferred on Google

The 19-year-old daughter of the two doctors remanded in custody over the death of singer Giorgos Mazonakis testified before an investigating judge on Friday, completing her statement after approximately one hour.

The young woman was summoned to testify following a request submitted by her father before his own questioning in the case.

According to reports, investigators focused on the circumstances at the medical office in the Kolonaki district during the critical hours Mazonakis spent there. The 19-year-old was reportedly present at the premises during that period.

She acknowledged that she had called Greece’s National Emergency Aid Center (EKAB), the country’s ambulance service, but said she had not seen the well-known singer, according to the same reports.

Investigators also questioned the 19-year-old about the plasmapheresis treatment she had received from her mother.

According to information made public, she confirmed that the treatment had taken place and said the procedure was completed in two separate phases.

Doctor Denies Having Foreign Bank Accounts

Meanwhile, the lawyer representing the male doctor has categorically denied reports claiming that his client holds bank accounts abroad containing millions of euros.

In a statement issued on the doctor’s behalf, the lawyer described the reports as entirely false and unfounded, disputing claims that the alleged discovery had been attributed to leaks from purported official sources.

“The doctor does not hold any bank account abroad, either in his own name or in the name of any legal entity under his control,” the statement said, adding that his financial and tax records were fully transparent.

The lawyer urged media outlets to stop circulating the information immediately and take appropriate steps to correct the record.

The statement also warned that the uncontrolled spread of unsubstantiated claims, particularly when attributed vaguely to supposed official sources, could damage the doctor’s reputation and undermine the presumption of innocence.

It further argued that such reports could compromise the client’s defense rights and create unjustified impressions among the public while a serious criminal investigation remains underway.